each potential answer to a legal question is called a

each potential answer to a legal question is called a

each potential answer to a legal question is called a

Welcome to our website negarinfo ! The topic of this post is about the “each potential answer to a legal question is called a” .

Thanks for being with us. đŸŒș

Each potential answer to a legal question is called a _______.

conclusion

What are Leading Questions?

When an attorney uses clever wording and specific details in their questioning of witnesses in order to give them the answer they desire, it’s called a leading question. As an example, consider the following hypothetical courtroom exchange:

Questioning Attorney: The defendant owned the firearm that is an exhibit in this case, correct?

Witness: Yes.

Questioning Attorney: And this is the firearm that was used in the murder, correct?

Witness: Yes.

As you can see, a sophisticated attorney can use leading questions to get a witness to validate the attorney’s words. In effect, this allows the attorney to indirectly testify through the witness, which can be quite effective.

Leading questions can also be used to create perceptions by not allowing a witness to qualify their answer. For example, in the exchange above, the witness may want to testify that the gun was stolen from the defendant before the murder, but since that question was not asked, the witness could not provide that specific answer, leaving certain perceptions in the minds of a jury.

MORE POSTS:

each potential answer to a legal question is called a
each potential answer to a legal question is called a

When Are Leading Questions Allowed?

Because of their potential to lead to misleading testimonial evidence, these types of questions aren’t allowed on direct examination, that is, when a party’s attorney is questioning their own witnesses. In those instances, attorneys must normally use open-ended questions such as, “On the day in question, what did you observe?”

more :  raphael adolini 1715

However, these questions sometimes call for narratives that can produce long speeches on irrelevant matters, wasting the time of the court and the parties. Open-ended narrative questions are unpopular with courts and should be avoided. Judges do have the discretion to allow leading questions during the direct examination of a witness in matters that:

  • Deal with simple or uncontested background issues in order to save the court’s time;
  • Will help to elicit the testimony of a witness who, due to age, incapacity, or limited intelligence, is having difficulty communicating her evidence; or
  • Involve adverse or hostile witnesses (witnesses are considered adverse or hostile when their interests or sympathies may lead them to resist testifying truthfully and in most cases, an adverse party or a witness associated with an adverse party is considered hostile).

Leading questions are also allowed during a cross-examination when an attorney is questioning the other party’s witnesses. This is because one of the purposes of cross-examination is to test the credibility of statements that a witness made on direct examination. It’s also due to the fact that that witnesses for one party may not be as forthcoming or helpful when questioned by the other party’s attorney.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.